Leading scientists and former WHO officials are calling for a global policy “reset,” arguing that prioritizing low-risk alternatives like e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches could cut smoking-attributable deaths in half by 2060.
A coalition of global health experts, including former World Health Organization directors, is urging governments to adopt risk-proportionate regulation for nicotine products. Citing comprehensive data from recent global summits, they project that transitioning just 20 percent of the world’s smokers to non-combustible alternatives could avert over 100 million premature deaths worldwide by 2060, while simultaneously delivering massive economic benefits to low- and middle-income countries.
The Scientific Case for a Policy “Reset”
Current global tobacco policies are failing the world’s more than 1 billion smokers. This is the stark conclusion drawn by leading economists, scientists, and former WHO officials, including Tikki Pang and Derek Yach. In a joint report alongside the Institute for Economic Affairs, the authors argue that a fundamental “reset” is required to prioritize innovation and low-risk alternatives—such as e-cigarettes, nicotine pouches, and heated tobacco products—over lethal combustible cigarettes.
The statistical projections are profound. The Global State of Tobacco Harm Reduction report indicates that if 20 percent of smokers switched to low-risk alternatives within the next 10 to 15 years, smoking-attributable deaths could be halved by 2060. “Embracing harm reduction alongside conventional measures could roughly double the lives saved compared to current policies alone,” the authors stated, estimating that over 100 million lives could be saved worldwide.
Epidemiological Evidence: Vaping vs. Combustibles
The push for reform is heavily backed by epidemiological data. A comprehensive Cochrane review found high-certainty evidence that e-cigarettes are more effective at helping smokers quit than traditional nicotine replacement therapies (NRTs). This aligns with the landmark Public Health England report, which concluded that vaping is 95 percent less harmful than smoking combustible cigarettes.
Dr. David Nutt of Imperial College London emphasized that while smoking kills approximately 8 million people annually, smoke-free alternatives can dramatically cut risks for those who cannot or will not quit nicotine entirely. Similarly, Cristine Delnevo, director of the Rutgers Institute for Nicotine and Tobacco Studies, led a study in JAMA Network Open suggesting that moving down the “risk continuum” to products like nicotine pouches is a net positive for public health.
Economic Impact and the Path Forward
The benefits of risk-proportionate regulation extend beyond public health into massive fiscal savings, particularly for developing nations. In the Philippines, a study by Professor Christopher Cabuay projected that if half of adult Filipino smokers switched to non-combustible alternatives, the country could save $3.4 billion annually—representing 0.87 percent of its gross domestic product.
During a recent panel organized by the International Association on Smoking Control & Harm Reduction (SCHORE) in Athens, 200 experts from 51 countries issued a unified position statement: “Tobacco control strategies must be reshaped to include harm reduction, and lower-risk alternatives should be actively encouraged alongside cessation and prevention measures.” The consensus is clear: science, not ideology, must guide the future of global nicotine regulation.
- Global Health Experts Demand Risk-Based Nicotine Regulation - March 16, 2026
- FDA Pivot: Potential Reintroduction of Adult-Oriented Vape Flavors Amid Regulatory Debate - March 12, 2026
- Iowa Governor Proposes Cigarette Tax Hike & 15% Vape Levy - February 6, 2026